Please share your thoughts on the PASS elections process

Validate & reform "who" can vote in the elections

This isnt a process item but it definetly needs to be addressed. The process by which PASS hands out ballots is flawed. The requirement of PASS only needing an email address to issue a ballot is wrong. PASS should require more info from members to allow voting in the elections. Something perhaps like name & email or maybe name, address & email. As it is there is apparently no way to keep someone with 1000 gmail accounts from gaming the system

3 votes
Vote
Sign in
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
or sign in with
  • facebook
  • google
    Password icon
    I agree to the terms of service
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Anonymous shared this idea  ·   ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    2 comments

    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      I agree to the terms of service
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      Submitting...
      • Karen LopezKaren Lopez commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        I'd even extend this to separating the "membership" of a person from their (could be valid reasons for) website accounts.

      • Mark BroadbentMark Broadbent commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Actually Allen, I'd like to take this a step further and have further criteria that entitles to a vote. For instance somebody who has never participated in the community should not have a vote imho. What that "participation" could be is open to debate but perhaps someone who has attended a conference... virtual or physical. Otherwise their vote is blind and based purely on guesswork and suposition.

      Feedback and Knowledge Base